http://miriampenguin.livejournal.com/ (miriampenguin.livejournal.com) wrote in sorcyress2011-10-07 06:05 am (UTC)
I agree with you about the multiple person thing if it could be unclear who the FB belongs to, but I generally make exceptions for wedding photos and person+recent baby photos (but not pictures of just the baby without the person).
no subject
I agree with you about the multiple person thing if it could be unclear who the FB belongs to, but I generally make exceptions for wedding photos and person+recent baby photos (but not pictures of just the baby without the person).